REFLECTING ON PASSIVE-AGGRESSION
People accuse me of being passive-aggressive. Yeah, so what? Is it better to be aggressive-aggressive? Or maybe you think I should just be simply passive. Like republikkkons are, as they watch an 80-year-old supremely passive-aggressive guy turn their party into a cliche' of comically stupid/corrupt government. The guy who Trump hired to paint the Lincoln Memorial could have stepped out of Central Casting, or the Soprano's. A short, fat, Italian-American with a fat cigar a bulky manilla envelope in their breast-pocket, and you don't want to know what's in the waistband under his suit coat. Vincent Pastore or Steve Schirippa.
Yeah, I know I'm a smart-ass; I'm a cynic, thats what we do. I'm not here to analyze myself, others can do that whether I approve or not. But I have developed my cynicism over seven decades of living life and noticing people who I admire for their activities on behalf of those who aren't insiders in some passive-agressive financial scheme. I am passive-aggressive about things I am passionate about, and I don't care if you approve, because I speak with that passion that moves me to care. I'm not getting paid to care, like those morons on the right lining up for the scraps Donald Trump throws out. I'm not one of those simpering fools in the Republikkkon party hiding behind their desks, afraid to offend a corporate funder. In my passive-aggressive way, i spell that party with three K's. Usually I append an 'on' behind those K's. Because, whether they like it or not they are meah about the KKK and the con-games done in broad daylight, as if intending to say, "yeah, so what? Go after me, I'll make you suffer". At other times I have another, more anatomical ending of that word. Something commonly heard from the lips of a passive-aggressive Brit. Still retaining the deserved KKk. That party, long ago lost its right to be honored for their moral example, and I am not the one to look for their salvation.
We tried. Most of us. Not necessarily me. We put up with Rush Limbaugh and Bill O'Reilly and a host of other right-wing sycophants, calling us libtards, dummycrats, femi-nazi's, and other insults. Sometimes, in my passive-aggressive way, I remind those people who stupidly call us libtards that liberals advance human progress and conservatives slow us down, i.e. retard. We listened to those people, one a currently sitting president, who demanded citizenship papers from a sitting president whose skin is darker than republikkkons are comfortable with. We heard the Obama's called monkeys. They were even aghast,aghast, that First Lady Michelle Obama planted an organic garden on the Whitehouse grounds. Then the First Lady that followed the Obama's, the only first Lady who once posed showing her public hairs, paved over Jackie Kennedy's rose garden. And you accuse me of passive-aggression? Even worse, the guy who said during his Electoral run that he could "grab women by their pussy" spread a vicious lie that Hillary Clinton was running a child sex ring from the basement of a pizza parlor. A pizza parlor that has no basement. And then they voted for the guy who was also an unapologetic child-abuser. But I'm the bad guy for being passive-aggressive. During all of this, Michelle Obama advised us that, "when they go low-we go high". How did that work out? I'm entitled to my passive-aggression! I earned that right! Mark Twain once described a cynic as "someone who did not arrive". Not only did we not arrive, you flipped us the bird as you sped past. So I will stand in solidarity with anyone whose passion does not end in the suppression of rights.
Comments
Post a Comment